The seafood industry's dark side
Historic Tour
For over three hundred years, generation after generation fished, crabbed, and harvested from the Bay. Times for the watermen were so bountiful, the town of Crisfield, dubbed "The Seafood Capital of the World", was built atop a bed of oyster shells from the bountiful harvest. In 1904, after some 250 years of growing as a sleepy fishing town, Crisfield boasted a population of 25,000 and was the second largest city in Maryland, with Baltimore being the largest.
By way the fish swims, the
Toddville-Bishopshead-Crocheron-Wingate tip of the southernmost most part of Dorchester
County is only a few quick squiggles, strong flip of the tail when the tide is
right, and a hearty leap or two out of the water to get to from Crisfield. At the height of this watermen's community,
the tip of Dorchester County boasted its own post office, a bank, a couple of
grocery stores, a couple of gas stations, a couple of restaurants and bars, a
department store, and, naturally, a couple of boat yards that not only
maintained existing fishing boats, but also built new ones.
Up through the 1950's, some three hundred years after the small fishing towns
became major suppliers of the seafood industry, many residents on the southern
tip of Dorchester County never left the area to go to town, except for maybe to
take the bus to see a movie in Cambridge on a Saturday night. Yes, thirty miles from Cambridge, the
Toddville-Bishopshead-Crocheron-Wingate communities were prosperous enough to
warrant running a Saturday bus service to get residents to town and back so
that they could spread some of their wealth outside of their isolated
communities.
All up and down the Bay, watermen's communities prospered, generation after
generation, for some three hundred years.
Isolated from the rest of Maryland, and always in their own time frame,
the communities developed their own unique dialects, customs, and
cultures. There were two sets of rules:
the way things were done and the way Eastern Shoremen got things done.
Before we take the modern day tour of these communities, we have to understand
that for the first 300 years or so, the small fishing villages up and down the
Bay slowly grew into major fishing ports and/or major suppliers of the seafood
industry. Times were good and the Bay
was limitless.
Changing Times
Times for the Eastern Shore began to change in the 1950's. Everyone focused their attention on the
opening of the Bay Bridge in 1952. From
the economic standpoint, watermen, as well as farmers, could quickly, and
efficiently, get their products to Baltimore, DC, and points beyond, all
markets that were relatively limited to them due to the geographic barrier of
the Bay.
With the opening of the Bay Bridge, many Eastern Shoremen saw their way of life beginning to die as the "foreigners" from the Western Shore flooded the area, and, eventually, started taking residence here. Little did they know that, despite the opening of the Bay Bridge, their way of life was already dying. Surely they felt it in the oyster harvesting. After almost a hundred years of environmentally catastrophic harvesting techniques of dredging, the peak harvests of the 1880's began to decline year after year.
By the 1950's, around the time the Bay Bridge opened, an Asian virus, probably first introduced to the Delaware Bay from Japanese oysters that were used to test their viability as a fishery product, began to take hold in parts of the Chesapeake Bay. Oyster harvests declined even more rapidly. The introduced Japanese oysters to the Delaware Bay didn't fare well, but they left a devastating legacy behind.
With the opening of the Bay Bridge, many Eastern Shoremen saw their way of life beginning to die as the "foreigners" from the Western Shore flooded the area, and, eventually, started taking residence here. Little did they know that, despite the opening of the Bay Bridge, their way of life was already dying. Surely they felt it in the oyster harvesting. After almost a hundred years of environmentally catastrophic harvesting techniques of dredging, the peak harvests of the 1880's began to decline year after year.
By the 1950's, around the time the Bay Bridge opened, an Asian virus, probably first introduced to the Delaware Bay from Japanese oysters that were used to test their viability as a fishery product, began to take hold in parts of the Chesapeake Bay. Oyster harvests declined even more rapidly. The introduced Japanese oysters to the Delaware Bay didn't fare well, but they left a devastating legacy behind.
While oysters may have been the first, most notable decline,
other signs of a dying Bay began to appear.
The water was becoming dirtier and some species of fish began to
disappear. By the 1980's, striped bass
all but disappeared from the Bay. A few
years later, the Maryland blue crab became threatened.
The easy answer, of course, was to blame the watermen for over fishing. When that answer wasn't enough, blame the farmer for allowing tons of nitrates to flow into the Bay. The harder answer for the cause of the dying Bay, and one still not admitted today, is the unbridled urban growth that swallowed the fishermen's communities on the Western Shore.
The easy answer, of course, was to blame the watermen for over fishing. When that answer wasn't enough, blame the farmer for allowing tons of nitrates to flow into the Bay. The harder answer for the cause of the dying Bay, and one still not admitted today, is the unbridled urban growth that swallowed the fishermen's communities on the Western Shore.
Form Hagerstown to
DC and eastward (including Baltimore), farmland and forested waterfront were
paved over to make room for the expanding population. Marshlands were filled in, industries arose, and urban sprawl
took whatever wooded lands were left.
Prime waterfront property became homes, complete with the paved streets,
paved driveways, and chemically manicured lawns, gardens, and landscape.
What damage to the Bay the watermen on the Eastern Shore
didn't get blamed for because of over fishing and damaging harvesting
techniques, the farmers got blamed for because of excessive nitrate runoff into
the Bay. The fact remains that a house
on a one-acre lot produces more runoff pollution to the Bay per year than a
300-acre farm. One doesn't need a
fancy degree to figure out where most of the Bay's pollution is originating
from. The pollution is coming from the
Western Shore with their unbridled growth from Frederick County eastward to the
Bay, including Washington, DC.
Even though the Bay was starting to die in the 1950's, other
than the watermen, no one took much notice.
In 1962, ten years after the Bay Bridge opened and Eastern Shoremen
began to feel their way of life was changing, Rachel Carson published a
compelling novel, "Silent Spring".
While Carson's novel is credited with starting the environmental
movement, it took a river fire in Ohio in 1969, one of a few notable river
fires throughout the previous 100 years, to jumpstart the environmental
movement. In earnest, people wanted the
environment cleaned up, and they wanted to know who the culprits for all the
pollution were to get them to clean up their acts.
It's human nature when one wants to point fingers at who did
wrong, the finger never points at oneself.
The Eastern Shore comprises about 10% of Maryland's population, so it
isn't hard to figure out where the fingers of blame would be pointing to when
the state decided to get serious about saving the Bay almost 45 years ago. The burden fell, and still falls, on the 10%
of Marylanders living on Delmarva, and the fullest brunt was felt, and is felt,
by our watermen and farmers.
What Could've Been Done - Branding the Chesapeake Bay
In 1916, on Hooper's Island, A. E. Phillips opened a crab
processing plant. By 1956, son Brice
and his wife, Shirley, opened a crab shack in Ocean City to sell the excess
crabs the plant on Hooper's Island produced.
While the oyster harvests were in great decline, the crabbing and
fishing was still bountiful, but it was this generation of watermen who could
have noticed the declining Bay, and, over the next twenty years, worked to
preserve the Maryland fishing industry.
By the late 1970's, to early 1980's, the next generation of
watermen had the opportunity to take everything learned in the previous twenty
years about the Bay's ecosystem and put in place a system to preserve the Bay's
fisheries and the integrity of the Maryland blue crab. By the early 1980's, oyster harvests were
already down to 1% of their historic harvests, rockfish all but disappeared
from the Bay, and the Maryland blue crab population showed its first signs of
stress.
What the watermen, the Watermen's Association, the Maryland
Seafood Industries Association, seafood house business owners, and state
politicians could have done was brand the Chesapeake Bay making seafood
harvested from the Bay a delicacy compared to equivalent seafood harvested
elsewhere. The branding may not have
worked for every type of seafood harvested, but it would have worked for the
oyster and the blue crab. The
year-round Bay temperature and salinity levels were ideal for producing the
salted-just-right oysters and the sweetest crab meat compared to oysters and
crabs harvested anywhere else.
What do we mean by "branding the Chesapeake
Bay"? The best example for
comparison is what France has done with their wine industry and their
truffles. France may get upset when a
bottle of champagne produced in New York carries the word,
"champagne", but despite the misleading label, everyone knows the
best champagnes are those produced in the Champagne region of France and are
willing to pay more for the best. In
recent news, France is in battle with China over truffles. The Chinese truffles are of inferior quality
compared to the French truffles, but that hasn't stopped the Chinese from
canning their inferior product, labeling the cans to mislead the average
consumer in believing the cans contain French truffles, and selling the cans of
truffles to Wal-Mart, where consumers can pay about ten bucks for a can of
truffles they think are the French truffles that normally sell for $3,000 an
ounce or more. France is rightfully
upset over the misleading labeling because, ultimately, if consumers think the
cans of truffles at Wal-Mart are French truffles, the market for the true
delicacy of French truffles would dwindle and the French truffle farmers would
be out of business.
Back in the late 1970's through the 1980's, the generation
of watermen leaders, seafood house business owners, and politicians had their
opportunity to preserve the reputation of the Chesapeake oyster, particularly
the Chincoteague oysters, and the Maryland blue crab much like the French have
done with their champagne and truffle industries. It took watermen several generations and over three hundred years
of fishing the Bay to establish Chesapeake seafood as the finest in the
world. It took one generation to destroy
that reputation.
Example of Growth and Missed Opportunity
A. E. Phillip's crab shack in Ocean City grew into several
restaurants along the East Coast and became a major importer of seafood to
ensure a year-round supply of fresh seafood.
They abandoned their roots on the Eastern Shore and moved their
headquarters to Baltimore, taking with them all the jobs watermen, who were
finding it harder and harder to make a living fishing the Bay, could have
taken.
In a search for cheap seafood, A. E. Phillip's began
importing their seafood. Crabs, for
example, may come from the Chesapeake, North Carolina, Venezuela, and even as
far away as Southeast Asia.
A look at some of their restaurants menus tells a different
story. The company that long since
abandoned its roots on the Eastern Shore boasts on it's menus about the
"proud, Maryland tradition" and offers "Maryland vegetable crab
soup" or "Chesapeake crab cakes". For the average diner, the impression left is they are eating
Maryland blue crab when, in reality, they are probably eating crab meat sourced
from anywhere else in the world. That
would be particularly true for this year.
Crab harvests in the Bay, as well as from the Delaware Bay to Florida,
have been at their lowest in decades.
We also need to look at what is happening in the crab
processing plants. A. E. Phillips and
Son, Inc., the crab processing plant started in 1916 on Hooper's Island and
gave rise to the A. E. Phillips restaurants, is managed by Jay Newcomb, county
commissioner for Dorchester County and owner of Old Salty's Restaurant on
Hooper's Island. You may remember him
from But Mexicans are cheaper....
Mr. Newcomb is one person of that generation that could have
set in motion the concept of branding the Chesapeake Bay. As the Bay's harvests began to fall short of
the demand for fresh seafood, he and other owners and managers of prominent
seafood houses, the Watermen's Association, The Chesapeake Bay Seafood Industries
Association, and local politicians could all have pushed for protections that
would have elevated Chesapeake Bay seafood, or at least some of it such as the
oyster and the blue crab, to a level of a delicacy superior to comparable
products on the market. Think of French
champagne and French truffles and you get a good idea of where Chesapeake
seafood, particularly the blue crab and oyster, could have been elevated to in
the seafood world.
Mr. Newcomb and his colleagues chose to discard the Maryland
seafood reputation that took over three hundred years and several generations
of watermen to build in favor of making bigger profits off of inferior products
imported from around the world.
The first step was to import cheap labor from Mexico to work
in the seafood houses. The second step
was to ignore the meaning of "Maryland" and "Chesapeake"
when referring to seafood cuisine. Blue
crabs brought up from North Carolina could still be labeled "Maryland blue
crab". Blue crabs imported from
Venezuela or Southeast Asia could still be packaged into "Maryland crab
cakes." Oysters from Illinois
could be canned as "Maryland oyster stew".
Just as the inferior quality of Chinese truffles could
potentially depress the value of the true delicacy of French truffles, passing
off seafood harvested from around the world as "Maryland" or
"Chesapeake" depresses the true value of Chesapeake harvested
seafood. Unfortunately, Mr. Newcomb's
generation, and Mr. Newcomb himself, chose bigger profits and bigger paychecks
over protecting the Maryland seafood industry's long, hard-built reputation.
Over the last twenty-five years, decisions made that have
brought the Maryland seafood industry to its present state has produced two big
winners: the few seafood packing house owners and managers earning bigger
profits and paychecks and Mexican workers earning a decent living compared to
available employment in their home country, even if the work is only
seasonal. Those decisions also produced
two big losers: the watermen and their families, who are finding it harder and
harder to stay above poverty level because they can't economically compete with
the products being harvested out-of-state and globally, and the consumer, who
will never know what a true Maryland blue crab or Chincoteague oyster tastes
like.
The Modern-Day Tour of Our Once Proud Fishing Communities
Now let's take the same tour we started this article out
with.
"The seafood capitol of the world", Crisfield, the
city built atop of oysters shells and was the second largest city in Maryland
in 1904 with a population of 25,000 is now a sleepy mostly tourist town with a
population of 2,726. Few watermen are
left behind to carry on the proud tradition that had been part of their
families for almost four hundred years.
The tip of Dorchester county, comprising the communities of
Wingate, Toddville, Bishopshead, and Crocheron and once boasted a thriving,
self-sufficient community complete with a post office, bank, department store, a couple of restaurants and bars, a couple of gas stations and grocery stores,
and a couple of boatyards are now ghost towns with only one country store and more
abandoned houses than lived-in homes.
What few watermen have remained struggle to keep their heads above
poverty level as they try to compete with the out-of-state and global seafood
markets. The watermen here are fast
becoming a faded memory of the proud heritage and culture that once was. In another twenty years, the last of the
watermen will probably have faded from memory and the communities won't even be
put on the maps any more.
That is the legacy the Watermen's Association, the Maryaland
Seafood Industries Association, seafood packing house owners, and local and
state politicians of the last thirty years have left behind.
Note: Unconfirmed rumors have it that Jay Newcomb has
approached some local watermen on the tip of Dorchester County asking them if
they would teach Mexican migrant workers how to fish the Bay. His plan is to hire the trained Mexican
workers on an hourly basis to do what the watermen have been doing for almost
four hundred years. We will be working
hard to confirm or refute these rumors.
We can only hope that our county commissioner, Jay Newcomb, is working
hard to raise the standard of living of our local watermen and preserve their
proud heritage instead of looking for ways to put them out of business so he
can increase the size of his bank account.
Editor's note added 04/18/14: related articles
But Mexican's are cheaper...
The branding of the Bay
Posted by Five Drunk Rednecks
Comments
Post a Comment