The bullies whining....
By coincidence, one of our local talk show hosts and a
former local talk show host, who now airs on a station in Kentucky, posted on
their respective FaceBook pages very similar posts on the same day. For your reference, the important excerpts of each posts are
reprinted below.
Posted by The Coffee Party
From Dan Gaffney, host at WXDE (Delaware 105.9), FaceBook
page - http://www.facebook.com/DanGaffneyShow:
Important follow up: Not about the “sign” flap directly,
but about the fallout from it. After attacks on my family by some ill-informed
vigilantes and a few other members of the community (who will stay un-named by
me for now) I need to post the following....
From Matt Walsh, host at WLAP, an AM news/talk station
out of Lexington, KY, FaceBook Page - http://www.facebook.com/mattwalshradio:
Here's an email I received from an anonymous wimp this
morning:
"Matt, you are bringing two children into a world
that is dangerous enough. They don't need their own home to be a death trap.
You said you have a gun in your house. How could you keep something like that
within the vicinity of CHILDREN? What if they get their hands on it? What then?
All of your love for the second amendment will go out the window, that's what.
Your gun crazy rants are too much to take. You are a reckless radio host and
now you will be a reckless father. Fool. With any luck you'll be fired before
your children are born."
You gotta love the faceless cowards. They'll never come
up to you in public, look you in the eye like a man and make these personal
attacks. No, they sit behind their keyboards like sniveling little weaklings
and pass their absurd judgments as they wish all sorts of bad things upon you
and your family. I'm used to it by now. It comes with the territory. I just
hope that one day God will grant me my wish of a face to face with one of these
bloated trolls. But I'm sure he won't, for the troll's sake.
With those two excerpts in place, we want to put two points
up front. First, as the rest of the
editorial will show, we are not "picking on" Mr. Gaffney nor Mr. Walsh. They simply provided us with readily accsessible quotes to use an example. Second, never do we condone the use of direct
threats to any person or a person's family and friends.
The sentiments echoed in both of these posts are the same
sentiments echoed by the "national stars" of talk radio such as
Limbaugh, Hannity, Savage, Stewart, Maher...and the list goes on. If you listen to talk radio enough, every
pundit out there will complain of the "threats" received.
If you have never listened to talk radio, save for maybe one
favorite personality, you don't need to read any further. The editorial will be lost on you. For fans of the talk radio format of
entertainment, please read on.
Anytime anyone enters the public arena, he is up for
ridicule and, yes, threats against him and his family. (Please note, I am using formal English,
which requires the masculine form. Feel
free to replace he with she or he/she.)
The big name public figures (like those on radio or TV) receive threats
on a daily basis. Less public figures (like anyone who posts their
opinions publicly on the Internet), receive occasional threats. As Mr. Walsh aptly put it, it goes with the
territory. You piss people off, they'll
try their damnedest to piss you off.
The simple solution, of course, is to stop reading a
person's FaceBook page, change radio stations, or flip the TV station. Problem solved.
Not quite. Turning
off the lesser public folk, like us at The Coffee Party, that's relatively easy
to do. Who the Hell reads this blog
anyways?
For the local public figures on radio or TV, flipping
stations is not so easy. They are the
public figures who have the advertising dollars behind them to keep them on air
and, potentially, influence the community's attitudes, public policy, and
outside perceptions of the community as a whole, for better or worse. If you care about your community, you're not
so apt to flip channels to ignore those who you think may be doing more harm
than good for the community you live in.
Move to the national public figures and now you multiplied the effect a
thousand fold.
Want an example? We
mentioned Limbaugh, Hannity, Savage,
Stewart, and Maher. Have you listened
to all of them or do you know them because of the influence their punditry has
had on our political system and society?
We have never listened to Ann Coulter because we refuse to listen to a
woman who speaks with an Adam's apple, but we're very aware of who she is and
how she helps shape American sentiment.
See? Turning them off doesn't lessen
their effect, an effect that will eventually affect you.
What does this have to do with the two local pundits quoted
in the opening of this article and the point of this editorial? Re-read what both hosts said, but, more
specifically, read how they said it.
They both give a clue why pundits generate tons of money for the advertisers
and why listeners get irate with them.
It's called bullying, that concept many pundits refuse to acknowledge as
a real problem, yet they are the biggest bullies around.
First, with Mr. Gaffney.
"Oh woe is me. I received
threats to me and my family because of what I said." (Yes, that's
paraphrasing and not a direct quote.)
Then he issues a subtle and open-ended threat of his own - some people who wrote him, of
whom disagrees with him, are in danger of being "exposed" for their
"hateful vitriol" sometime in the future.
Second, with Mr. Walsh, he opens his commentary with a quote from an "anonymous wimp". Then he proceeds to talk in generic terms
about anonymous writers to his show as "faceless cowards", which, of
course, implies the writer of the email that prompted the post is a faceless
coward. Oh, and anonymous writers love to sit
behind "their keyboards like sniveling weaklings and pass
their absurd judgments..." Well,
that sounds a lot like the talk show pundits sitting anonymously behind their
microphones passing absurd judgments.
Here's the deal.
Free speech comes with a price we're all very keenly aware of. You say what you want, you piss people
off. In the old days, no big deal. (Not quite, but that's another topic.) With information available to everyone at
their fingertips, you have to be careful who you piss off today. Piss them off enough, they can find you in a
few clicks of a mouse. That is why this
blog remains anonymous.
If you choose a career of pissing people off, deal with the
vitriol. Hopefully, you are making good
money to afford state-of-the-art security systems around your home, and,
depending on your popularity, bodyguards.
If not, change career fields.
For the rest of us, as long as we know you have the power to
tell your listeners who we are, as Mr. Gaffney suggested; Mr. Walsh has done
in the past; and, at least Mr. Limbaugh has done, if not others, we'll remain anonymous when we voice our criticism of what you
have to say. We want to be heard, but
we don't think being heard is worth getting beaten up or vandalized because of
your rabid fans. You chose the profession so deal with the vitriol. Those of us who email you chose to talk to you one-on-one. The smart ones will keep it anonymous because we know the bullies behind the microphones will gladly name names because they have their rabid fans to back them up.
Comments
Post a Comment